Comments on: How can Ubisoft make Assassin’s Creed less shit?

By: Łoś

Łoś — Thu, 21 Mar 2013 20:38:00 +0000

I completely don’t agree with you. For me AC is perfect as it is.

By: David

David — Wed, 13 Mar 2013 15:31:00 +0000

Assassin’s Creed Revelations was disappointing. Assassin’s Creed III was shit… Assassin’s Creed IV would be the twice disappointing shit…

I believe that, most important than all the ‘gameplay points’ you make, is that they take storyline seriously and explore more appealing historical times. Unlike many other franchises, story is important for an AC game. Character development in AC2 and Brotherhood was outstanding in every way… in Revelations it sucked balls and in 3 it was nonexistent. 3 had the worst protagonist in the series and 4 only looks the same.

I would take a much worthier historical setting than America and keep the storyline in Europe, where only the Assassin’s Creed world feels authentic and unique.

By: hesoyamdonMonster

hesoyamdonMonster — Wed, 13 Mar 2013 11:00:00 +0000

u should try Assassin’s Creed brotherhood its one of the best open world game, it extremely polish and action starts from beginning but not like Assassin’s Creed 2 where it take 3-4 hour to get into action ,

By: Northy179

Northy179 — Sat, 09 Mar 2013 23:21:00 +0000

I played Assassin’s Creed 1 to completion and enjoyed the experience even though combat was somewhat stupid towards the end.

I played 2 to about the 3 hour mark, i put it back on the shelf and never played it again.

I don’t care what they do or what they could possibly change, this game is permanently shelved for me. They should have stopped milking it at a trilogy. Everyone loves a trilogy.